Andres Suarez Montousse vs Aitor Gonzalez Gonzalez
2000 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation (A95).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andres Suarez Montousse vs Aitor Gonzalez Gonzalez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andres Suarez Montousse (2064)
- Black
- Aitor Gonzalez Gonzalez (1905)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation (A95)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andres Suarez Montousse (2064) and Aitor Gonzalez Gonzalez (1905) was played in 2000 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation (A95). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andres Suarez Montousse games or Aitor Gonzalez Gonzalez games? This Andres Suarez Montousse vs Aitor Gonzalez Gonzalez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andres Suarez Montousse vs Aitor Gonzalez Gonzalez?
Andres Suarez Montousse vs Aitor Gonzalez Gonzalez (2000) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Andres Suarez Montousse vs Aitor Gonzalez Gonzalez?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation (ECO A95).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andres Suarez Montousse vs Aitor Gonzalez Gonzalez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.