Robin Stuermer vs Jerome Dueren
Wuerttemberg Ch U17, date unknown · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robin Stuermer vs Jerome Dueren with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robin Stuermer (2185)
- Black
- Jerome Dueren (2190)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Wuerttemberg Ch U17
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robin Stuermer (2185) and Jerome Dueren (2190) was played at Wuerttemberg Ch U17 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robin Stuermer games or Jerome Dueren games? This Robin Stuermer vs Jerome Dueren encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robin Stuermer vs Jerome Dueren?
Robin Stuermer vs Jerome Dueren finished 1–0, a win for Robin Stuermer.
What opening was played in Robin Stuermer vs Jerome Dueren?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (ECO E73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robin Stuermer vs Jerome Dueren, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.