Zbigniew Strzemiecki vs Bartosz Socko
POL Ch, 2010 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Zbigniew Strzemiecki vs Bartosz Socko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Zbigniew Strzemiecki (2333)
- Black
- Bartosz Socko (2643)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- POL Ch
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Zbigniew Strzemiecki (2333) and Bartosz Socko (2643) was played at POL Ch in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Zbigniew Strzemiecki games or Bartosz Socko games? This Zbigniew Strzemiecki vs Bartosz Socko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Zbigniew Strzemiecki vs Bartosz Socko?
Zbigniew Strzemiecki vs Bartosz Socko (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Zbigniew Strzemiecki vs Bartosz Socko?
The game opened with the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (ECO C12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Zbigniew Strzemiecki vs Bartosz Socko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.