Aleksa Strikovic vs David Larino Nieto
5. Tilve Mem 2016, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksa Strikovic vs David Larino Nieto with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksa Strikovic (2506)
- Black
- David Larino Nieto (2481)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 5. Tilve Mem 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksa Strikovic (2506) and David Larino Nieto (2481) was played at 5. Tilve Mem 2016 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksa Strikovic games or David Larino Nieto games? This Aleksa Strikovic vs David Larino Nieto encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksa Strikovic vs David Larino Nieto?
Aleksa Strikovic vs David Larino Nieto (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Aleksa Strikovic vs David Larino Nieto?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksa Strikovic vs David Larino Nieto, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.