Manfred Streiter vs Wolfgang Weinwurm
2013 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (D92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Manfred Streiter vs Wolfgang Weinwurm with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Manfred Streiter (1909)
- Black
- Wolfgang Weinwurm (2113)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (D92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Manfred Streiter (1909) and Wolfgang Weinwurm (2113) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (D92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Manfred Streiter games or Wolfgang Weinwurm games? This Manfred Streiter vs Wolfgang Weinwurm encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Manfred Streiter vs Wolfgang Weinwurm?
Manfred Streiter vs Wolfgang Weinwurm (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Wolfgang Weinwurm.
What opening was played in Manfred Streiter vs Wolfgang Weinwurm?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (ECO D92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Manfred Streiter vs Wolfgang Weinwurm, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.