Pawel Stoma vs Eligiusz Grzybowski
POL Ch U16, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pawel Stoma vs Eligiusz Grzybowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pawel Stoma (2075)
- Black
- Eligiusz Grzybowski (2170)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- POL Ch U16
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pawel Stoma (2075) and Eligiusz Grzybowski (2170) was played at POL Ch U16 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pawel Stoma games or Eligiusz Grzybowski games? This Pawel Stoma vs Eligiusz Grzybowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pawel Stoma vs Eligiusz Grzybowski?
Pawel Stoma vs Eligiusz Grzybowski finished 1–0, a win for Pawel Stoma.
What opening was played in Pawel Stoma vs Eligiusz Grzybowski?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pawel Stoma vs Eligiusz Grzybowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.