Dmitriy Stoljarov vs Alexey Erofeev
2008 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dmitriy Stoljarov vs Alexey Erofeev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dmitriy Stoljarov (1967)
- Black
- Alexey Erofeev (2148)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dmitriy Stoljarov (1967) and Alexey Erofeev (2148) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dmitriy Stoljarov games or Alexey Erofeev games? This Dmitriy Stoljarov vs Alexey Erofeev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dmitriy Stoljarov vs Alexey Erofeev?
Dmitriy Stoljarov vs Alexey Erofeev (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Dmitriy Stoljarov.
What opening was played in Dmitriy Stoljarov vs Alexey Erofeev?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (ECO A17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dmitriy Stoljarov vs Alexey Erofeev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.