IS. Stoliar vs Georgy A Ilivitsky
Kislovodsk, 1956 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation (B64).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay IS. Stoliar vs Georgy A Ilivitsky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- IS. Stoliar
- Black
- Georgy A Ilivitsky
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Kislovodsk
- Year
- 1956
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation (B64)
About this chess game
This chess game between IS. Stoliar and Georgy A Ilivitsky was played at Kislovodsk in 1956 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation (B64). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more IS. Stoliar games or Georgy A Ilivitsky games? This IS. Stoliar vs Georgy A Ilivitsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won IS. Stoliar vs Georgy A Ilivitsky?
IS. Stoliar vs Georgy A Ilivitsky (1956) finished 0–1, a win for Georgy A Ilivitsky.
What opening was played in IS. Stoliar vs Georgy A Ilivitsky?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B64).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of IS. Stoliar vs Georgy A Ilivitsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.