Tomislav Stojadinovic vs Milan Ristic
2012 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tomislav Stojadinovic vs Milan Ristic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tomislav Stojadinovic (1890)
- Black
- Milan Ristic (2129)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tomislav Stojadinovic (1890) and Milan Ristic (2129) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tomislav Stojadinovic games or Milan Ristic games? This Tomislav Stojadinovic vs Milan Ristic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tomislav Stojadinovic vs Milan Ristic?
Tomislav Stojadinovic vs Milan Ristic (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Milan Ristic.
What opening was played in Tomislav Stojadinovic vs Milan Ristic?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (ECO E63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tomislav Stojadinovic vs Milan Ristic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.