Metodi Stoinev vs Dimo Terziev
20. ch-EUR Indiv 2019, 2019 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Metodi Stoinev vs Dimo Terziev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Metodi Stoinev (2215)
- Black
- Dimo Terziev (2041)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 20. ch-EUR Indiv 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09)
About this chess game
This chess game between Metodi Stoinev (2215) and Dimo Terziev (2041) was played at 20. ch-EUR Indiv 2019 in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Metodi Stoinev games or Dimo Terziev games? This Metodi Stoinev vs Dimo Terziev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Metodi Stoinev vs Dimo Terziev?
Metodi Stoinev vs Dimo Terziev (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Dimo Terziev.
What opening was played in Metodi Stoinev vs Dimo Terziev?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (ECO C09).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Metodi Stoinev vs Dimo Terziev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.