Gunter Stock vs Paul Morley
WS/M/330, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gunter Stock vs Paul Morley with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gunter Stock (2158)
- Black
- Paul Morley (2272)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WS/M/330
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gunter Stock (2158) and Paul Morley (2272) was played at WS/M/330 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gunter Stock games or Paul Morley games? This Gunter Stock vs Paul Morley encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gunter Stock vs Paul Morley?
Gunter Stock vs Paul Morley (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Paul Morley.
What opening was played in Gunter Stock vs Paul Morley?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (ECO E58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gunter Stock vs Paul Morley, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.