Nathan Stirling vs Gregory J Canfell
AUS Ch, 2001 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nathan Stirling vs Gregory J Canfell with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nathan Stirling (2141)
- Black
- Gregory J Canfell (2284)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- AUS Ch
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nathan Stirling (2141) and Gregory J Canfell (2284) was played at AUS Ch in 2001 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nathan Stirling games or Gregory J Canfell games? This Nathan Stirling vs Gregory J Canfell encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nathan Stirling vs Gregory J Canfell?
Nathan Stirling vs Gregory J Canfell (2001) finished 0–1, a win for Gregory J Canfell.
What opening was played in Nathan Stirling vs Gregory J Canfell?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (ECO B81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nathan Stirling vs Gregory J Canfell, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.