Marko Stipandic vs Damir Sulc
2009 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation (E55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marko Stipandic vs Damir Sulc with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marko Stipandic (2087)
- Black
- Damir Sulc (2273)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation (E55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marko Stipandic (2087) and Damir Sulc (2273) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation (E55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marko Stipandic games or Damir Sulc games? This Marko Stipandic vs Damir Sulc encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marko Stipandic vs Damir Sulc?
Marko Stipandic vs Damir Sulc (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Marko Stipandic vs Damir Sulc?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation (ECO E55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marko Stipandic vs Damir Sulc, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.