Franz Stimpel vs Alexander Braun
9. Bavarian Open, 2005 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Franz Stimpel vs Alexander Braun with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Franz Stimpel (2289)
- Black
- Alexander Braun (1783)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 9. Bavarian Open
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86)
About this chess game
This chess game between Franz Stimpel (2289) and Alexander Braun (1783) was played at 9. Bavarian Open in 2005 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (D86). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Franz Stimpel games or Alexander Braun games? This Franz Stimpel vs Alexander Braun encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Franz Stimpel vs Alexander Braun?
Franz Stimpel vs Alexander Braun (2005) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Franz Stimpel vs Alexander Braun?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Classical Variation (ECO D86).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Franz Stimpel vs Alexander Braun, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.