Eva Stepanyan vs Lida Batsi
5. ChessAmateur Belgrade, 2019 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Eva Stepanyan vs Lida Batsi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Eva Stepanyan (2147)
- Black
- Lida Batsi (1462)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 5. ChessAmateur Belgrade
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04)
About this chess game
This chess game between Eva Stepanyan (2147) and Lida Batsi (1462) was played at 5. ChessAmateur Belgrade in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (C04). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Eva Stepanyan games or Lida Batsi games? This Eva Stepanyan vs Lida Batsi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Eva Stepanyan vs Lida Batsi?
Eva Stepanyan vs Lida Batsi (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Eva Stepanyan.
What opening was played in Eva Stepanyan vs Lida Batsi?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line (ECO C04).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Eva Stepanyan vs Lida Batsi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.