Valera Stepanov vs Sebastian Emilio Santos Baez
SC-00092, 2011 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Valera Stepanov vs Sebastian Emilio Santos Baez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Valera Stepanov (1682)
- Black
- Sebastian Emilio Santos Baez (1957)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- SC-00092
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Valera Stepanov (1682) and Sebastian Emilio Santos Baez (1957) was played at SC-00092 in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (D18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Valera Stepanov games or Sebastian Emilio Santos Baez games? This Valera Stepanov vs Sebastian Emilio Santos Baez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Valera Stepanov vs Sebastian Emilio Santos Baez?
Valera Stepanov vs Sebastian Emilio Santos Baez (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Valera Stepanov vs Sebastian Emilio Santos Baez?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System (ECO D18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Valera Stepanov vs Sebastian Emilio Santos Baez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.