Kirill Fedorovich Stepanov vs Clemens Berchtold
WS/M/091, 2007 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kirill Fedorovich Stepanov vs Clemens Berchtold with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Clemens Berchtold (2035)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WS/M/091
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kirill Fedorovich Stepanov and Clemens Berchtold (2035) was played at WS/M/091 in 2007 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kirill Fedorovich Stepanov games or Clemens Berchtold games? This Kirill Fedorovich Stepanov vs Clemens Berchtold encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kirill Fedorovich Stepanov vs Clemens Berchtold?
Kirill Fedorovich Stepanov vs Clemens Berchtold (2007) finished 0–1, a win for Clemens Berchtold.
What opening was played in Kirill Fedorovich Stepanov vs Clemens Berchtold?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kirill Fedorovich Stepanov vs Clemens Berchtold, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.