Patrik Stepan vs Vladimir Dvorak
Ostravsky Konik Open 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Alatortsev-Lisitsyn Line (A98).
Analyze this game
Open Patrik Stepan vs Vladimir Dvorak on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Patrik Stepan (2143)
- Black
- Vladimir Dvorak (2004)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Ostravsky Konik Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Alatortsev-Lisitsyn Line (A98)
About this chess game
This chess game between Patrik Stepan (2143) and Vladimir Dvorak (2004) was played at Ostravsky Konik Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Alatortsev-Lisitsyn Line (A98). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Patrik Stepan games or Vladimir Dvorak games? This Patrik Stepan vs Vladimir Dvorak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Alatortsev-Lisitsyn Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Patrik Stepan vs Vladimir Dvorak?
Patrik Stepan vs Vladimir Dvorak (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Vladimir Dvorak.
What opening was played in Patrik Stepan vs Vladimir Dvorak?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation, Alatortsev-Lisitsyn Line (ECO A98).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Patrik Stepan vs Vladimir Dvorak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.