N. Stenqvist vs Gediminas Ragainis
Corr Baltic tt, 1986 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation, Benoni Defense (E31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay N. Stenqvist vs Gediminas Ragainis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- N. Stenqvist
- Black
- Gediminas Ragainis (1665)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Corr Baltic tt
- Year
- 1986
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation, Benoni Defense (E31)
About this chess game
This chess game between N. Stenqvist and Gediminas Ragainis (1665) was played at Corr Baltic tt in 1986 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation, Benoni Defense (E31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more N. Stenqvist games or Gediminas Ragainis games? This N. Stenqvist vs Gediminas Ragainis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation, Benoni Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won N. Stenqvist vs Gediminas Ragainis?
N. Stenqvist vs Gediminas Ragainis (1986) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in N. Stenqvist vs Gediminas Ragainis?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation, Benoni Defense (ECO E31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of N. Stenqvist vs Gediminas Ragainis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.