Christian, Dr. Steinwachs vs Bernd W Dahm
2010 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Christian, Dr. Steinwachs vs Bernd W Dahm with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Christian, Dr. Steinwachs (2116)
- Black
- Bernd W Dahm (2076)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Christian, Dr. Steinwachs (2116) and Bernd W Dahm (2076) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Christian, Dr. Steinwachs games or Bernd W Dahm games? This Christian, Dr. Steinwachs vs Bernd W Dahm encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Christian, Dr. Steinwachs vs Bernd W Dahm?
Christian, Dr. Steinwachs vs Bernd W Dahm (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Bernd W Dahm.
What opening was played in Christian, Dr. Steinwachs vs Bernd W Dahm?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (ECO C05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Christian, Dr. Steinwachs vs Bernd W Dahm, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.