Martin Steinert vs Franjo Lovakovic
ZH-00431, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Martin Steinert vs Franjo Lovakovic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Martin Steinert (2097)
- Black
- Franjo Lovakovic (2282)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- ZH-00431
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71)
About this chess game
This chess game between Martin Steinert (2097) and Franjo Lovakovic (2282) was played at ZH-00431 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (B71). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Martin Steinert games or Franjo Lovakovic games? This Martin Steinert vs Franjo Lovakovic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Martin Steinert vs Franjo Lovakovic?
Martin Steinert vs Franjo Lovakovic (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Franjo Lovakovic.
What opening was played in Martin Steinert vs Franjo Lovakovic?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Levenfish Variation (ECO B71).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Martin Steinert vs Franjo Lovakovic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.