Juraj Steiner vs Petr Zacek
Ceske Budejovice Open, 2019 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juraj Steiner vs Petr Zacek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juraj Steiner (1896)
- Black
- Petr Zacek (1883)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Ceske Budejovice Open
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juraj Steiner (1896) and Petr Zacek (1883) was played at Ceske Budejovice Open in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juraj Steiner games or Petr Zacek games? This Juraj Steiner vs Petr Zacek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juraj Steiner vs Petr Zacek?
Juraj Steiner vs Petr Zacek (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juraj Steiner vs Petr Zacek?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (ECO D36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juraj Steiner vs Petr Zacek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.