Jiri Stehlik vs Tomas Koci
2012 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jiri Stehlik vs Tomas Koci with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jiri Stehlik (2001)
- Black
- Tomas Koci (1400)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jiri Stehlik (2001) and Tomas Koci (1400) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jiri Stehlik games or Tomas Koci games? This Jiri Stehlik vs Tomas Koci encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jiri Stehlik vs Tomas Koci?
Jiri Stehlik vs Tomas Koci (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jiri Stehlik vs Tomas Koci?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jiri Stehlik vs Tomas Koci, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.