Johan J. Steenkamp vs Pierre E. Van Der Walt
Centurion, 1997 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Johan J. Steenkamp vs Pierre E. Van Der Walt with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Johan J. Steenkamp (2180)
- Black
- Pierre E. Van Der Walt (2052)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Centurion
- Year
- 1997
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Johan J. Steenkamp (2180) and Pierre E. Van Der Walt (2052) was played at Centurion in 1997 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Johan J. Steenkamp games or Pierre E. Van Der Walt games? This Johan J. Steenkamp vs Pierre E. Van Der Walt encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Johan J. Steenkamp vs Pierre E. Van Der Walt?
Johan J. Steenkamp vs Pierre E. Van Der Walt (1997) finished 1–0, a win for Johan J. Steenkamp.
What opening was played in Johan J. Steenkamp vs Pierre E. Van Der Walt?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Johan J. Steenkamp vs Pierre E. Van Der Walt, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.