Jacobus J Steenkamp vs Jason S. Davies
Cape Town, 2002 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacobus J Steenkamp vs Jason S. Davies with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacobus J Steenkamp
- Black
- Jason S. Davies (2049)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Cape Town
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacobus J Steenkamp and Jason S. Davies (2049) was played at Cape Town in 2002 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacobus J Steenkamp games or Jason S. Davies games? This Jacobus J Steenkamp vs Jason S. Davies encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacobus J Steenkamp vs Jason S. Davies?
Jacobus J Steenkamp vs Jason S. Davies (2002) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jacobus J Steenkamp vs Jason S. Davies?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacobus J Steenkamp vs Jason S. Davies, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.