Pieter Steen vs Quinten Ducarmon
18. HZ Open 2014, 2014 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pieter Steen vs Quinten Ducarmon with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pieter Steen (2100)
- Black
- Quinten Ducarmon (2479)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 18. HZ Open 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pieter Steen (2100) and Quinten Ducarmon (2479) was played at 18. HZ Open 2014 in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (E48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pieter Steen games or Quinten Ducarmon games? This Pieter Steen vs Quinten Ducarmon encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pieter Steen vs Quinten Ducarmon?
Pieter Steen vs Quinten Ducarmon (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Pieter Steen.
What opening was played in Pieter Steen vs Quinten Ducarmon?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense (ECO E48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pieter Steen vs Quinten Ducarmon, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.