Daniel-Stefan Stan vs George-Catalin Ardelean
TCh-ROM A, 2005 · Result 0–1 · Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack (A68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel-Stefan Stan vs George-Catalin Ardelean with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel-Stefan Stan (1970)
- Black
- George-Catalin Ardelean (2447)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TCh-ROM A
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack (A68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel-Stefan Stan (1970) and George-Catalin Ardelean (2447) was played at TCh-ROM A in 2005 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack (A68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel-Stefan Stan games or George-Catalin Ardelean games? This Daniel-Stefan Stan vs George-Catalin Ardelean encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel-Stefan Stan vs George-Catalin Ardelean?
Daniel-Stefan Stan vs George-Catalin Ardelean (2005) finished 0–1, a win for George-Catalin Ardelean.
What opening was played in Daniel-Stefan Stan vs George-Catalin Ardelean?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO A68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel-Stefan Stan vs George-Catalin Ardelean, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.