Alexey Stakh vs Alexander Babiy
Sun Pawn Open, 2007 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexey Stakh vs Alexander Babiy with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexey Stakh
- Black
- Alexander Babiy (1906)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Sun Pawn Open
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexey Stakh and Alexander Babiy (1906) was played at Sun Pawn Open in 2007 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexey Stakh games or Alexander Babiy games? This Alexey Stakh vs Alexander Babiy encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexey Stakh vs Alexander Babiy?
Alexey Stakh vs Alexander Babiy (2007) finished 0–1, a win for Alexander Babiy.
What opening was played in Alexey Stakh vs Alexander Babiy?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (ECO A17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexey Stakh vs Alexander Babiy, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.