Peter Stadler vs Arkadij Rotstein
Latschach AUT, 29. Open, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Stadler vs Arkadij Rotstein with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Stadler (2118)
- Black
- Arkadij Rotstein (2491)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Latschach AUT, 29. Open
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Stadler (2118) and Arkadij Rotstein (2491) was played at Latschach AUT, 29. Open in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Stadler games or Arkadij Rotstein games? This Peter Stadler vs Arkadij Rotstein encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Stadler vs Arkadij Rotstein?
Peter Stadler vs Arkadij Rotstein (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Arkadij Rotstein.
What opening was played in Peter Stadler vs Arkadij Rotstein?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Stadler vs Arkadij Rotstein, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.