Jan Michael, Dr. Sprenger vs Maxim Matlakov
31. ECC Open 2015, 2015 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jan Michael, Dr. Sprenger vs Maxim Matlakov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jan Michael, Dr. Sprenger (2510)
- Black
- Maxim Matlakov (2689)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 31. ECC Open 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jan Michael, Dr. Sprenger (2510) and Maxim Matlakov (2689) was played at 31. ECC Open 2015 in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jan Michael, Dr. Sprenger games or Maxim Matlakov games? This Jan Michael, Dr. Sprenger vs Maxim Matlakov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jan Michael, Dr. Sprenger vs Maxim Matlakov?
Jan Michael, Dr. Sprenger vs Maxim Matlakov (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Maxim Matlakov.
What opening was played in Jan Michael, Dr. Sprenger vs Maxim Matlakov?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (ECO C91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jan Michael, Dr. Sprenger vs Maxim Matlakov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.