Marko Sponheim vs Amruta Sunil Mokal
ZMDI Open 2014, 2014 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marko Sponheim vs Amruta Sunil Mokal with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marko Sponheim (2118)
- Black
- Amruta Sunil Mokal (2056)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- ZMDI Open 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marko Sponheim (2118) and Amruta Sunil Mokal (2056) was played at ZMDI Open 2014 in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marko Sponheim games or Amruta Sunil Mokal games? This Marko Sponheim vs Amruta Sunil Mokal encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marko Sponheim vs Amruta Sunil Mokal?
Marko Sponheim vs Amruta Sunil Mokal (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Amruta Sunil Mokal.
What opening was played in Marko Sponheim vs Amruta Sunil Mokal?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marko Sponheim vs Amruta Sunil Mokal, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.