David J Spence vs Richard York-Weaving
4NCL Division 1b, 2017 · Result ½–½ · Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David J Spence vs Richard York-Weaving with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David J Spence (2165)
- Black
- Richard York-Weaving (2271)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4NCL Division 1b
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05)
About this chess game
This chess game between David J Spence (2165) and Richard York-Weaving (2271) was played at 4NCL Division 1b in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David J Spence games or Richard York-Weaving games? This David J Spence vs Richard York-Weaving encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David J Spence vs Richard York-Weaving?
David J Spence vs Richard York-Weaving (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David J Spence vs Richard York-Weaving?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (ECO E05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David J Spence vs Richard York-Weaving, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.