Sebastian Spector vs Nicolas Albarracin
ARG Ch U10 sf etapa-2, 2003 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sebastian Spector vs Nicolas Albarracin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sebastian Spector (2135)
- Black
- Nicolas Albarracin (1935)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ARG Ch U10 sf etapa-2
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sebastian Spector (2135) and Nicolas Albarracin (1935) was played at ARG Ch U10 sf etapa-2 in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sebastian Spector games or Nicolas Albarracin games? This Sebastian Spector vs Nicolas Albarracin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sebastian Spector vs Nicolas Albarracin?
Sebastian Spector vs Nicolas Albarracin (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Sebastian Spector.
What opening was played in Sebastian Spector vs Nicolas Albarracin?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (ECO D53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sebastian Spector vs Nicolas Albarracin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.