Marcos Valerio A. Souza vs Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz
2015 · Result 0–1 · Catalan Opening: Closed (E01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcos Valerio A. Souza vs Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcos Valerio A. Souza (2110)
- Black
- Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz (1874)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Closed (E01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcos Valerio A. Souza (2110) and Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz (1874) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Closed (E01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcos Valerio A. Souza games or Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz games? This Marcos Valerio A. Souza vs Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcos Valerio A. Souza vs Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz?
Marcos Valerio A. Souza vs Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz.
What opening was played in Marcos Valerio A. Souza vs Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Closed (ECO E01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcos Valerio A. Souza vs Matheus Erick Silva Queiroz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.