Ramon Santana De Souza vs Cleber Lemos Da Rocha
2. Niteroi Chess Open, 2022 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ramon Santana De Souza vs Cleber Lemos Da Rocha with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ramon Santana De Souza (1876)
- Black
- Cleber Lemos Da Rocha (1704)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 2. Niteroi Chess Open
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ramon Santana De Souza (1876) and Cleber Lemos Da Rocha (1704) was played at 2. Niteroi Chess Open in 2022 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ramon Santana De Souza games or Cleber Lemos Da Rocha games? This Ramon Santana De Souza vs Cleber Lemos Da Rocha encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ramon Santana De Souza vs Cleber Lemos Da Rocha?
Ramon Santana De Souza vs Cleber Lemos Da Rocha (2022) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ramon Santana De Souza vs Cleber Lemos Da Rocha?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ramon Santana De Souza vs Cleber Lemos Da Rocha, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.