Victor Soultanbeieff vs Rafael Domenech
1936 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Attack (D64).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Victor Soultanbeieff vs Rafael Domenech with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Victor Soultanbeieff
- Black
- Rafael Domenech
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 1936
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Attack (D64)
About this chess game
This chess game between Victor Soultanbeieff and Rafael Domenech was played in 1936 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Attack (D64). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Victor Soultanbeieff games or Rafael Domenech games? This Victor Soultanbeieff vs Rafael Domenech encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Victor Soultanbeieff vs Rafael Domenech?
Victor Soultanbeieff vs Rafael Domenech (1936) finished 1–0, a win for Victor Soultanbeieff.
What opening was played in Victor Soultanbeieff vs Rafael Domenech?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Attack (ECO D64).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Victor Soultanbeieff vs Rafael Domenech, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.