Luis Soto vs Oliverio Vargas Villalobos
Costa Rica Ch, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Soto vs Oliverio Vargas Villalobos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Soto
- Black
- Oliverio Vargas Villalobos (2110)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Costa Rica Ch
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Soto and Oliverio Vargas Villalobos (2110) was played at Costa Rica Ch and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Soto games or Oliverio Vargas Villalobos games? This Luis Soto vs Oliverio Vargas Villalobos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Soto vs Oliverio Vargas Villalobos?
Luis Soto vs Oliverio Vargas Villalobos finished 0–1, a win for Oliverio Vargas Villalobos.
What opening was played in Luis Soto vs Oliverio Vargas Villalobos?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Soto vs Oliverio Vargas Villalobos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.