Victor Soto Balastegui vs Josep A. Pinilla Sanchez
2016 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Victor Soto Balastegui vs Josep A. Pinilla Sanchez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Victor Soto Balastegui (1764)
- Black
- Josep A. Pinilla Sanchez (1892)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Victor Soto Balastegui (1764) and Josep A. Pinilla Sanchez (1892) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Victor Soto Balastegui games or Josep A. Pinilla Sanchez games? This Victor Soto Balastegui vs Josep A. Pinilla Sanchez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Victor Soto Balastegui vs Josep A. Pinilla Sanchez?
Victor Soto Balastegui vs Josep A. Pinilla Sanchez (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Victor Soto Balastegui vs Josep A. Pinilla Sanchez?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense (ECO A13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Victor Soto Balastegui vs Josep A. Pinilla Sanchez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.