Paulo Soto Avalos vs Antonio Marques Taltavull
POR-chT2, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paulo Soto Avalos vs Antonio Marques Taltavull with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paulo Soto Avalos (1477)
- Black
- Antonio Marques Taltavull (2083)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- POR-chT2
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paulo Soto Avalos (1477) and Antonio Marques Taltavull (2083) was played at POR-chT2 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paulo Soto Avalos games or Antonio Marques Taltavull games? This Paulo Soto Avalos vs Antonio Marques Taltavull encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paulo Soto Avalos vs Antonio Marques Taltavull?
Paulo Soto Avalos vs Antonio Marques Taltavull finished 1–0, a win for Paulo Soto Avalos.
What opening was played in Paulo Soto Avalos vs Antonio Marques Taltavull?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO B13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paulo Soto Avalos vs Antonio Marques Taltavull, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.