Miroslav Sorkovsky vs Mikulas Manik
2015 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miroslav Sorkovsky vs Mikulas Manik with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miroslav Sorkovsky (2183)
- Black
- Mikulas Manik (2400)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miroslav Sorkovsky (2183) and Mikulas Manik (2400) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miroslav Sorkovsky games or Mikulas Manik games? This Miroslav Sorkovsky vs Mikulas Manik encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miroslav Sorkovsky vs Mikulas Manik?
Miroslav Sorkovsky vs Mikulas Manik (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Miroslav Sorkovsky vs Mikulas Manik?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (ECO B67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miroslav Sorkovsky vs Mikulas Manik, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.