Esben Lauge Sorensen vs Mikael Ramkilde
2020 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Esben Lauge Sorensen vs Mikael Ramkilde with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Esben Lauge Sorensen (1943)
- Black
- Mikael Ramkilde (1952)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Esben Lauge Sorensen (1943) and Mikael Ramkilde (1952) was played in 2020 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Esben Lauge Sorensen games or Mikael Ramkilde games? This Esben Lauge Sorensen vs Mikael Ramkilde encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Esben Lauge Sorensen vs Mikael Ramkilde?
Esben Lauge Sorensen vs Mikael Ramkilde (2020) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Esben Lauge Sorensen vs Mikael Ramkilde?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Esben Lauge Sorensen vs Mikael Ramkilde, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.