Michael Song vs Frankie Stewart
Scarborough CC ch Reserves Open, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Song vs Frankie Stewart with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Song (2078)
- Black
- Frankie Stewart (1766)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Scarborough CC ch Reserves Open
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Song (2078) and Frankie Stewart (1766) was played at Scarborough CC ch Reserves Open in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Song games or Frankie Stewart games? This Michael Song vs Frankie Stewart encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Song vs Frankie Stewart?
Michael Song vs Frankie Stewart (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Michael Song.
What opening was played in Michael Song vs Frankie Stewart?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (ECO C58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Song vs Frankie Stewart, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.