Serik Soltanov vs Ilkhom Ergashev
24. IPCA WCh 2025, 2025 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Serik Soltanov vs Ilkhom Ergashev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Serik Soltanov (2203)
- Black
- Ilkhom Ergashev (1724)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 24. IPCA WCh 2025
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Serik Soltanov (2203) and Ilkhom Ergashev (1724) was played at 24. IPCA WCh 2025 in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Serik Soltanov games or Ilkhom Ergashev games? This Serik Soltanov vs Ilkhom Ergashev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Serik Soltanov vs Ilkhom Ergashev?
Serik Soltanov vs Ilkhom Ergashev (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Serik Soltanov.
What opening was played in Serik Soltanov vs Ilkhom Ergashev?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Serik Soltanov vs Ilkhom Ergashev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.