Ruslan Soltanici vs Alexandru-Mircea Butolo
Iuliu Szabo Mem IM 2023, 2023 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ruslan Soltanici vs Alexandru-Mircea Butolo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ruslan Soltanici (2357)
- Black
- Alexandru-Mircea Butolo (2071)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Iuliu Szabo Mem IM 2023
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ruslan Soltanici (2357) and Alexandru-Mircea Butolo (2071) was played at Iuliu Szabo Mem IM 2023 in 2023 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ruslan Soltanici games or Alexandru-Mircea Butolo games? This Ruslan Soltanici vs Alexandru-Mircea Butolo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ruslan Soltanici vs Alexandru-Mircea Butolo?
Ruslan Soltanici vs Alexandru-Mircea Butolo (2023) finished 1–0, a win for Ruslan Soltanici.
What opening was played in Ruslan Soltanici vs Alexandru-Mircea Butolo?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ruslan Soltanici vs Alexandru-Mircea Butolo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.