Anthony Solomons vs Rachael EDWARD-DAPPA
39. Olympiad women, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anthony Solomons vs Rachael EDWARD-DAPPA with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anthony Solomons (1932)
- Black
- Rachael EDWARD-DAPPA (1822)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 39. Olympiad women
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anthony Solomons (1932) and Rachael EDWARD-DAPPA (1822) was played at 39. Olympiad women in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anthony Solomons games or Rachael EDWARD-DAPPA games? This Anthony Solomons vs Rachael EDWARD-DAPPA encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anthony Solomons vs Rachael EDWARD-DAPPA?
Anthony Solomons vs Rachael EDWARD-DAPPA (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Anthony Solomons.
What opening was played in Anthony Solomons vs Rachael EDWARD-DAPPA?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (ECO D53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anthony Solomons vs Rachael EDWARD-DAPPA, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.