Bartosz Socko vs Aleksandr V. Leontiev
Chigorin Mem Rapid, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (D92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bartosz Socko vs Aleksandr V. Leontiev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bartosz Socko (2631)
- Black
- Aleksandr V. Leontiev (2310)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Chigorin Mem Rapid
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (D92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bartosz Socko (2631) and Aleksandr V. Leontiev (2310) was played at Chigorin Mem Rapid in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (D92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bartosz Socko games or Aleksandr V. Leontiev games? This Bartosz Socko vs Aleksandr V. Leontiev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bartosz Socko vs Aleksandr V. Leontiev?
Bartosz Socko vs Aleksandr V. Leontiev (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Bartosz Socko.
What opening was played in Bartosz Socko vs Aleksandr V. Leontiev?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Attack (ECO D92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bartosz Socko vs Aleksandr V. Leontiev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.