Daniel Snerthammer vs Tallak Uberg Naerland
Sandnes CC Ch, 2006 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (E60).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Snerthammer vs Tallak Uberg Naerland with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Snerthammer (1949)
- Black
- Tallak Uberg Naerland (2053)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Sandnes CC Ch
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (E60)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Snerthammer (1949) and Tallak Uberg Naerland (2053) was played at Sandnes CC Ch in 2006 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (E60). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Snerthammer games or Tallak Uberg Naerland games? This Daniel Snerthammer vs Tallak Uberg Naerland encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: West Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Snerthammer vs Tallak Uberg Naerland?
Daniel Snerthammer vs Tallak Uberg Naerland (2006) finished 0–1, a win for Tallak Uberg Naerland.
What opening was played in Daniel Snerthammer vs Tallak Uberg Naerland?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (ECO E60).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Snerthammer vs Tallak Uberg Naerland, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.