Evaldas Slusnys vs Gediminas Rutkauskas
2018 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (B34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Evaldas Slusnys vs Gediminas Rutkauskas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Evaldas Slusnys (1846)
- Black
- Gediminas Rutkauskas (1812)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (B34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Evaldas Slusnys (1846) and Gediminas Rutkauskas (1812) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (B34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Evaldas Slusnys games or Gediminas Rutkauskas games? This Evaldas Slusnys vs Gediminas Rutkauskas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Evaldas Slusnys vs Gediminas Rutkauskas?
Evaldas Slusnys vs Gediminas Rutkauskas (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Evaldas Slusnys vs Gediminas Rutkauskas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (ECO B34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Evaldas Slusnys vs Gediminas Rutkauskas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.