Sergio Slipak vs Pablo Ismael Acosta
92. ch-ARG 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sergio Slipak vs Pablo Ismael Acosta with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sergio Slipak (2437)
- Black
- Pablo Ismael Acosta (2409)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 92. ch-ARG 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sergio Slipak (2437) and Pablo Ismael Acosta (2409) was played at 92. ch-ARG 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sergio Slipak games or Pablo Ismael Acosta games? This Sergio Slipak vs Pablo Ismael Acosta encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sergio Slipak vs Pablo Ismael Acosta?
Sergio Slipak vs Pablo Ismael Acosta (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Sergio Slipak.
What opening was played in Sergio Slipak vs Pablo Ismael Acosta?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (ECO D36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sergio Slipak vs Pablo Ismael Acosta, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.