Tomas Sladovnik vs Otto Zakoucky
Klatovy op-B, date unknown · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tomas Sladovnik vs Otto Zakoucky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tomas Sladovnik (2007)
- Black
- Otto Zakoucky (1483)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Klatovy op-B
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tomas Sladovnik (2007) and Otto Zakoucky (1483) was played at Klatovy op-B and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tomas Sladovnik games or Otto Zakoucky games? This Tomas Sladovnik vs Otto Zakoucky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tomas Sladovnik vs Otto Zakoucky?
Tomas Sladovnik vs Otto Zakoucky finished 1–0, a win for Tomas Sladovnik.
What opening was played in Tomas Sladovnik vs Otto Zakoucky?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (ECO A17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tomas Sladovnik vs Otto Zakoucky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.